Tuesday, 23 September 2014

It's official - Woden's Folk worship Hitler



A few months ago I made a post about the bizarre Woden’s Folk organisation. Unbenownst to me, its founder Wulf Ingessunu had, shortly beforehand, begun operating a new blog under the name Wulfinga.

In my post I provided evidence that Woden’s Folk is a pro-Nazi organisation. I also pointed out that one of its most active members believes Hitler to have been an incarnation of a god, and that Wulf Ingessunu appears to have the same opinion.

Ingessunu's new blog provides further evidence that this is the case. Consider this passage:
“The end of the last cycle was closed by the incarnation of Wotan upon Earth in Germany, and the subsequent war against the Dark Forces which was the equivalent to the mythical Twelve Nights of Yule (1933 - 1945). This heralded the appearance of the 'Manu' who revived the Divine Order of Caste and held back the growing power of the Dark Forces and their plans for global control - at a spiritual level as much as a material level.”
The period from 1933 to 1945, of course, covers Hitler's time in power. If you are still unsure as to who the divine avatar who "revived the Divine Order of Caste and held back the growing power of the Dark Forces", then notice that Hitler is later specifically named in the same post:
“Only through recognising that a god can actually incarnate in the flesh will we be able to understand what I am trying to say - figures such as Alexandra the Great, Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan and Adolf Hitler  can only be understood for what they were through a knowledge of the meaning of an avatar. This force can be creative or it can be destructive but it is there to herald a change in the order of things…”
Well, there we have it. There is now little room to doubt that Wulf Ingessunu, founder of Woden’s Folk, considers Hitler to have been an avatar of Woden who heroically fought against “Dark Forces” in World War II.
In a later post Ingessunu makes it even more explicit that he associates the Allies with the forces of darkness, and the Nazis with divine gods:
“A great deal is made of the 'Occult Reich' or 'Nazi Occultism' but rarely do we find anything about the occult forces that were working here in England, forces that were trying to shape a 'New World Order' after the catastrophe of World War II.

[…]

Dion Fortune used certain magical techniques to try to influence the course of the war, and to bring about the victory of the 'Allies' over the Third Reich.

There are two distinct things that emerge from a study of this work, the first being the influences behind her ideas and magical workings, and (to us) the important magical ideas that she used to influence events of her era - ideas that can easily be reversed and used against these same Forces of Evil that she and other Dark Lodges used against the rising of the Old Germanic Gods in the Germany of the time.”
Ingessunu goes on to cite Dion Fortune’s anti-Nazi views as being part of a Judeo-Christian plot against Aryans:
“Like much of the 'New Age' stuff banded about today, the work of this group also involved 'angelic' presences, these 'angels' being a Christian concept. Dion Fortune also mentions various Christian concepts used in her workings, proving beyond doubt that her work was concerned with the furtherance of the Judaeo-Christian aims, which are, and always have been, designed to distort the Folk-Soul of our Race.”
After this, Ingessunu quotes Dion Fortune’s comment that “There is no room for Nazism and democratic civilisation on the same globe, and one or the other will have to get off it.” Here is his response to this belief:
“We have seen what 'democratic civilisation' can do with the 'Brit-Am' alliance under the new 'American Empire' which has caused and created wars ever since World War II, and indeed caused that war and the previous world war too. This is rather more than a war between 'Nazism' and 'democratic civilisation' since it is a war between the evolutionary forces that are aiding man's evolution to the 'Superman', and the forces that are holding back that evolution through the creation of the 'Ultimate Man' (Nietzsche). The former seeks to strengthen the individual ego to create the Ultimate I,  whilst the latter seeks to merge the 'ego' into the 'All' and thus destroy the 'ego' altogether.”
He goes on:
“Only through these methods could the English be stopped from joining with their Germanic Brothers in Germany in a Holy War against the Jotun. It was the 'White Traitors' whose work undermined that of the Light Forces and this was done through such occult lodges as the Fraternity of the Inner Light.”
So, there we have it. Wulf Ingessunu believes that the Nazis were fighting a “holy war”, and blames “white traitors” for preventing the English from fighting alongside Hitler.

Woden’s Folk are a Nazi cult.



As a final note, here's something I've posted before - a Facebook message from the Steadfast Trust charity which openly invites the Hitler-worshippers of Woden's Folk to one of its events:



Now that Woden's Folk have been thoroughly exposed as neo-Nazis, perhaps the Steadfast Trust will issue a public statement denouncing the group and officially cutting all ties with it.


But I doubt it.

Friday, 19 September 2014

Metapedia and Basileus

On 14 July Basileus, an editor of the neo-Nazi wiki Metapedia, posted an article on English nationalism. I'm flattered to say that he drew upon my own three-post history of the "Englisc" nationalist movement:



Predictably, he's labelled me a communist. I'm actually an individualist, not a communist, but somehow I doubt that typing "individualist" next to each and every link to my blog would have the same emotive effect.

I'm already aware that Englisc nationalists hold a particular dislike for Normans and Jews, but Basileus takes an approach which is new to me by conflating the two groups. His introduction mentions the "Judeo-Norman oligarchy", and he later claims that
"The Norman race who rules Britain along with their Jewish financiers (whom they often interbreed with) have shown a deep hostility to the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic (Gaelic/Brythonic) masses for many, many centuries."
The article also claims that Woden's Folk is based on "the 6th century prophesy of the Hooded Men". The prophecy of the Hooded Man was actually created for the 1980s television series Robin of Sherwood; even the founder of Woden's Folk has admitted this fact, but Basileus seems to think that he can sweep it under the carpet.

In addition to the article itself, Basileus has put together this handy-dandy list of organisations, people and concepts related to English nationalism:



This is an odd mix. Although I've treated Englisc nationalism as a lunatic fringe subset of English nationalism, Basileus has done more or less the opposite by throwing a few mainstream cultural nationalists (such as Roy Faiers, founder of This England magazine) into a list that is skewed more towards bigots and nutters (such as Clive Calladine, Wulf Veldasson and Dan Rayner)

As for the organisations, some of them - such as Englisc Resistence - are little more than Facebook pages, and appear to have been included in the list primarily because I mentioned them in my overview of Englisc nationalism.

So, who is this Basileus fellow?

For a start, he is one of the key writers at the English-language Metapedia, a site which (perhaps unsurprisingly) was put together by a tiny handful of people. I took a look at the site's "recent changes" page and the vast majority of edits in the past few months were made by three people: A Wyatt Mann, NatAll75 and Basileus.

So far, the largest third-party body of information on him is at Encyclopadia Dramatica. This page should be taken with a grain of salt because, well, it's Encyclopedia Dramatica, but a lot of the information about his activities on Wikipedia under names such as "Yorkshirian" is solidly sourced.

Here are some of Basileus' finest moments. First, his description of Winston Churchill:
"Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, (30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965) was a freemason and dilligent servant of Jewish finance, who portrayed himself to the world as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He was the main politician involved in bringing Britain into World War II, whre he commited numerous war crimes, including causing the deaths of civilians, mostly Germans but even his own people."

In this curious conspiracy theory, Basileus cites "virile fascistic alphas" as the ideal man:
"Some figures in the alternative media such as Alan Watt and Alex Jones have focused in their works on the deliberate feminisation of Western men through chemical polution of the food and water supplies. The primary aim of this is to increase the levels of estrogen and reduce testosterone in men; one of the side-effects of this, including a general feminisation can be the growth of 'man-boobs' (gynaecomastia); an actual transsexual morphing of the male body against the will or consent of the general public.  This is a conspiracy to destroy European genetics, to turn men into degenerate liberal betas, instead of virile fascistic alphas, making them more passive to foreign invasion and laying down to the scheming ways of the plutocracy."

Unsurprisingly, he doesn't like Jews very much:
"For example, Ashkenazi Jews are highly intelligent people and yet they are the most bloodthirsty, animalistic band of psychopathic monsters on the face of the earth. Their crimes against humanity (ie - Bolshevism, formenting wars, revolutions, despoiling humans through their usury) easily dwarf that of low-IQ groups such as Australian Aboriginals for instance."

It gets worse:
"What is the origin of garlic as protection from vampires? There seems to be many similarities between vampires and Jews. Parasitic predators who live off the blood of others."

Basileus is also responsible for moving Metapedia's article on the Holocaust to "Jewish casualties of World War II", replacing the original page with this handy list:


Hmm.

Tuesday, 16 September 2014

Dan Rayner

I've been thinking about a post on Dan Rayner, founder of Nationalist Asatru News. I recently noticed that RationalWiki.org had already done the job by posting an article about him - which has since been deleted on the grounds that he is too obscure to be worth covering. So, here is an archive of their deleted article...


Dan Rayner is a 20 year old British white supremacist, holocaust denier and internet-conspiracy theorist crank. 

Rayner is a member of various white nationalist websites and blogs, and identifies as a 'pagan racial separatist'. He founded the Nationalist Asatru News in October 2013 which he describes as an "operational News company and political community organization outfit, having already completed 2 public meetings". In reality, it is little more than a shoddy website. Its sole member is also Rayner, and his two public meetings consisted of fewer than ten neo-Nazis (including a former Birmingham BNP organizer) who would go on to describe Rayner as a "weirdo" on the VNNforum.

[Note: From the link provided as a source, I am not sure which member is being referred to here. The word "weirdo" is not used in the thread, although "JackbootShaman" refers to Rayner as a "very weird kid"]

Aside from being a racist, Rayner is an Asatru pagan, and he has described his nutty racialized religious views in an interview hosted by Red Ice Radio.



He attended a "pro-Golden Dawn" fascist demonstration alongside National Front members outside the Greek Embassy of London on 9th November 2013.


Rayner currently is a Politics & Philosophy student at the University of Sheffield, England. The university is apparently aware of his extremist views, but has not been able to expel him. In August, 2014 he uploaded a video to YouTube where he is shown cycling around parts of Sheffield with a camera, moaning at the amount of Muslims he sees.


An assortment of skinheads and neo-Nazis at Stormfront have fallen out with Rayner, since he has described National Action as a "Jewish infiltrated" group.

Rayner also claims Nick Griffin is Jewish, which has caused him to be unpopular among British National Party members. Instead of voting BNP, Rayner has called for white nationalists to vote tactically for UKIP in the 2015 General Election.

In a desperate attempt to gain some followers, he has shut down his poorly received Nationalist Asatru News website and relaunched it as englishnews.org, stating that Asatru News was merely a "test phase". English News contains more insane ramblings from the man himself but is essentially the same website

Dan Rayner on LinkedIn
Facebook page

Thursday, 4 September 2014

Malorie Blackman and "too many white faces": anatomy of a media distortion


Malorie Blackman, as perceived by her detractors.


Last week children's author Malorie Blackman argued that kids' books should have more ethnic diversity. Sky News ran an article on her comments, quoting her as saying that "[readers] want to escape into fiction as well and read about other people, other cultures, other lives, other planets and so on, but I think there is a very significant message that goes out when you cannot see yourself at all in the books you are reading. I think it is saying 'well, you may be here, but do you really belong?'"

Seems a perfectly reasonable argument to me.

But what title did Sky decide to give the article?

"Children's Books 'Have Too Many White Faces'"




Now, let's make this absolutely clear. Nowhere in any of the quotes from Blackman featured in the article, or in the accompanying video, does she use the phrase "too many white faces." She calls for more non-white faces, yes, but this is not the same thing.

The headline seems to be referring to a comment made by Nikita Lalwani that "if everyone [in children's books] is white or Caucasian, it is just not accurate" - and this is a statement which is hard to disagree with. It does not equal "too many white faces."

You cannot even chalk Sky's misrepresentation up to a half-full/half-empty interpretation of Blackman's comments. In this era of self-published ebooks, it is possible for virtually infinite numbers of novels to be available on the marketplace. There is absolutely no reason why raising the number of books with non-white characters would involve decreasing the amount of books focused on white protagonists.

Nor is Blackman calling for books which demonise white people. One positive reaction to her comments was posted by an author who made the following comments:

"A call for more diversity shouldn’t be controversial.  Of course we need to see more diversity and inclusion in books, not just in ethnicity but representing kids from all walks and ways of life.  This isn’t political correctness, it’s just makes sense for stories to reflect the world around us and it’s only right that children get to see characters that they can identify with. 
[...] 
I once had a conversation with someone in publishing who was uncomfortable that one of the ‘baddies’ in my story happened to be black.  She said that it could send out the wrong message.  I was rather taken aback and pointed out that the main ‘baddie’ in the story happened to be a white bloke (and the ‘heroine’ happened to be mixed race).  These creations weren’t ‘goodies’ or ‘baddies’ by virtue of the colour of their skin.  Their actions and behaviour were character led, not colour led. It seems dishonest and unrealistic to portray any non-white characters as paragons of goodness for the sake of political correctness."

The Sky headline appears to have been chosen as a cynical means of getting hits from outraged reactionaries, but to its credit the site later revised the article with the more accurate title of "Call For More Ethnic Diversity In Kids' Books."

The original headline had already opened Blackman to a barrage of abuse, however, as she related in a follow-up article:

"Sky News saw fit to headline my interview – Children’s Books 'Have Too Many White Faces', a phrase I never used and which never even crossed my mind. When I complained, Sky apologised and changed the headline, but by then the damage had been done, with a number of publications publishing the Sky article with its original inflammatory headline. 
A deluge of racist abuse then descended upon my head. My Twitter feed was inundated with racist comments thinly disguised as indignation. I made the mistake of deleting a number of them, reporting two of the most threatening. I should not only have left them in my Twitter feed, but also retweeted every single one of them for my followers to see. I won’t make that mistake twice."

Amongst the far-right sites to attack Blackman was the Anglo-Saxon Foundation. A poster calling himself Woden's Child started a thread about the matter in a sub forum called "Anti-English/Anti-White racism and prejudice"; the topic simply repeated the original Sky headline, with a link to a Yahoo mirror of the article. Woden's Child later added his own thoughts:



Ironic how he claims that liberals "merely repeat a set of rules that govern their brainwashed state" and that "Talking sense and listening to anyone else's viewpoint is not in their remit" when he himself obviously hasn't listened to Blackman's point of view, and judged her arguments entirely by Sky's inaccurate headline. The Anglo-Saxon Foundation and their ilk like to think of themselves as awakened, and able to see through any media distortion; but this thread proves that they are quite willing to swallow a mass media lie, so long as it is a lie that fits their ideology.

Member Andy followed up with a pile of gibberish:



Saxon Patriot, meanwhile, claims that Blackman's objections are part of a Marxist book-burning plan:



This is obviously nonsense. The fact that Malorie Blackman has celebrated L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by dressing up as the Wicked Witch of the West proves that she is not out to destroy all classic children's literature.

What begins with book-burnings, argues Teutoburg Weald, will lead to political dissidents being burnt at the stake or shipped to concentration camps:



Incidentally, as I wrote here, Teutoburg Weald (real name Clive Calladine) is a Nazi sympathiser who considers Anders Breivik a hero and has advocated the murder of liberals and non-whites. To see him waxing lyrical about free speech and the evils of totalitarianism is positively nauseating.

After the concentration camps, says Witnere, there will be a genocide against all white English people sanctioned by none other than Stephen Fry himself:



Just to recap: Malorie Blackman calls for more children's books featuring ethnically diverse characters; the Anglo-Saxon Foundation views this as the first step in a process which will lead to all white people in England being rounded up and killed. And Blackman is meant to be the unreasonable one here!?

Eventually, Woden's Child linked to a news report which described how Sky had misquoted Blackman and the resulting barrage of racist abuse she abused online. Did he apologise for contributing to the misrepresentation of Blackman's entirely innocuous comments? No - his only response to this cyberbullying was "Ah, diddums."



As a final note, one member of the Anglo-Saxon Foundation is a self-published novelist named S.A. Swaffington. Under the name Ryan West, he wrote a novel called The Rise of the Saxons: And the Legend of Hengest and Horsa in which a bunch of proto-Nazi protagonists massacre children and lust after thirteen-year-old girls during an attempted genocide. Here is an excerpt from a review on Amazon:

'The Rise of the Saxons follows a band of Angle, Saxon and Jute "heroes" as they launch a campaign of genocide against the Britons (in the words of the main character, "lets holocaust them into oblivion"). They take a particular fondness for murdering defenceless children: near the start of the book Hengest slits the throat of a little girl who had been captured as a slave, and later on he uses a spiked ball to smash in the head of a nine-year-old boy who is cowering in fear. Meanwhile, two of his buddies throw small children into the air and catch them on swords, purely for fun.
The heroes of the story are associated with overtly Nazi or neo-Nazi imagery, including swastikas, double lightning bolts, raised-arm salutes, skinhead hair styles and - again - multiple uses of the word "holocaust".
There is one more thing which I think needs to be noted about this novel, however. When children are not being massacred, they are being sexualised.
At one point the character Hrothgar flirts with the female lead, Dresden. When she tells him that she is thirteen years old, he replies "Nearly a woman then, that's old enough for me... What's the matter love? I'll be gentle".
Dresden objects, but this is simply because she already has a boyfriend - Hrothgar is still allowed to join the "good guys", with this incident never being mentioned again. The novel portrays it as perfectly acceptable for a grown man to lust after a thirteen year old girl.
[...]There is nothing inherently wrong with a historical novel giving a "warts and all" portrayal of its chosen setting. But the main problem with Rise of the Saxons, as other reviewers have noted, is its propagandistic slant. In his note at the back, the author remarks that
"We are taught in England that we are British and therefore have viewed our history from a British perspective and so naturally we have viewed the Anglo-Saxons as foreign invaders. But if we say `NO!` to the people that wish to oppress English identity and do the most un-politically correct thing and think of our history from an English perspective then the Anglo-Saxons weren`t foreign at all, they were us. And we should honour their achievements and tell their stories, because if we don`t, then who will?"
Meanwhile, one of the five-star reviews expresses hope that "this book will act as a spark for other creative authors to produce works that glorify our Germanic English ancestors". But even setting aside the violence and racism, what is honourable or glorious about a grown adult making sexual passes at a thirteen-year-old?'
Sorry, Anglo-Saxon Foundation, but when it comes to portrayals of children in fiction, I'd say that Malorie Blackman is doing a better job of it than you lot.

Monday, 14 July 2014

The history of the "Englisc" nationalist movement, part 3: The grassroots fail to grow

This is the third and (for the time being) final post on the history of what I have termed the Englisc nationalist movement.

In the first post, I looked at the foundations of the movement, laid in large part by a writer named Tony Linsell. In the second post I charted how an online forum, the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, had provided a gathering point for the members of the movement. In this post, I will look at the movement's unseuccessful attempts to reach out to the public with grassroots organisations.



English Shieldwall (established 2010)


The English Shieldwall is a campaign group that was founded by "Youngy" (discussed in the previous post) along with Lee Ingram, a man whom I wrote about here. If Englisc nationalism had a Mt. Rushmore, then Ingram would be the fourth face - the other three being Tony Linsell, Wulf Ingessunu and Anglo-Saxon Foundation webmaster Seaxan.



Lee "Ingy" Ingram, possibly Tony Linsell's most active protege.



 Excerpt from Lee Ingram's blog, archived here.


For a complete history of the English Shieldwall and its activities, see RationalWiki. Suffice to say that it intended to be a campaign group similar to the EDL but focused on Englisc nationalism rather than anti-Islamist protests (although it dabbled in the latter as well).

Both of its founders were, at the time of the organisation's creation, members of the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, although Ingram is no longer a member of either group. The ASF also hosts the official Shieldwall forum. So big is the overlap that the ASF and Shieldwall may as well be considered two arms of the same group - one active on the Internet, the other active on the streets.

Formerly active, at least. The English Shieldwall appears to have wrapped up its activities in 2011, although it was never officially dissolved. In short, it was an attempt to create a grassroots organisation that simply never got off the ground.

The English Shieldwall website claims that "We have been fortunate to have benefited from a generous grant from the Steadfast Trust". In turn, the English Shieldwall has donated money to the Anglo-Saxon Foundation:

"I'd like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the ES for their recent donation which is outlined below. This has already been put to good use towards the running costs of the site for the next year. So once again, you have my thanks.

'Please accept this donation of two hundred pounds from the English Shieldwall.

We appreciate the constant, often unrewarding work you do through the Englisc Gateway and the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, and felt it was time that your work and effort was recognised. As we don't produce awards or medals, we have done the next best thing - a donation towards a website that we wouldn't exist without.

We will also take this opportunity to update you on our aims and objectives for 2012.

Our current aim sees us working towards encouraging folk to set up English Community Groups, such as the piloting group in Leicester, as well as promoting and celebrating English festival days. We will be promoting and where possible, supporting groups and organisations that we feel represent the best of English tradition, culture and heritage, as well as presenting opportunities for folk of English ethnicity - especially with regard to the traditional family setup.

As ever, we stay away from political matters, English religious debate and the monarchy, leaving these issues to the individual. Our focus is bringing the folk together in traditional ways.

We hope that you agree with our aims as we do yours, and look forward to the rest of 2012 and its many events and gatherings.

Regards,
English Shieldwall'"

From this, it would appear that the Steadfast Trust's money has indirectly been spent on funding a racist Internet forum. The Charity Commission really should look into this.

Incidentally, since writing the previous post in this series, I have found out the English Shieldwall co-founder Youngy/Bretwalda Randwulf is actually named Paul Young, thanks to this quotation from Lee Ingram (written after the two men fell out with each other):






A typical posting by Paul "Youngy" Young. This is a man whom the purportedly non-racist Steadfast Trust thinks is deserving of funds.




English Community Group (Leicester)/English Advocates (established 2011)


Somewhere along the line Lee Ingram got into a dispute with his fellow Anglo-Saxon Foundation and English Shieldwall members, resulting in him being banned from the former and leaving the latter. In the tried and true tradition of fringe politics, this bout of infighting resulted in the creation of a knock-off organisation.

As noted previously, the Steadfast Trust hoped to inspire its supporters to create "English community groups" around the country. A few of them tried, but most got little further than starting up Facebook pages (see RationalWiki for an overview); the only one that had anything remotely resembling success was the Leicester group, which at least made it into the local paper a couple of times.



Clive Potter, the "ordinary Englishman" who thinks that grey aliens are warning us about the effects of interracial marriage.


The ECG(L) was originally chaired by a very strange man named Clive Potter, an ex-BNP member and ufologist who is no longer affiliated with the group. Other key members include Paul Brant and Gary Thompson. However, from the get-go, the true driving force of the organisation seems to have been Lee Ingram.



Our pal Lee Ingram again.


The ECG(L)'s roots as an English Shieldwall splinter group are pretty clear. Just compare this page on the English Shieldwall website…




...with this page on the ECG(L) website:




Clearly, one is lifting from the other.

The ECG(L) has received funding from the Steadfast Trust. It stands to reason that the charity would back activities in this city, given that the Steadfast Trust's events co-ordinator Mark Taylor has declared Leicester to be "the country's worst town", apparently because "they are soon going to outnumber the ethnic English".

"This far and no further OR ELSE", he threatens:



The ECG(L) apparently could not sustain itself as a local group, however, and in March this year it rebranded itself as a nationwide group called English Advocates.




In my earlier post about Lee Ingram I concluded that he was a rather simple-minded fellow who had allowed himself to become a useful idiot for racism, but was not necessarily a racist himself. I'm reconsidering that position after seeing that he posted (or allowed to be posted) this image on the official English Advocates Facebook page:




The photograph, from 2006, shows a gang of machete-wielding guerillas from East Timor acting as part of a rebel campaign against the country's government (exactly what a lot of people in Englisc nationalism want to carry out here in England, in fact). It seems doubtful that Ingram knows or cares about the exact political situation behind the image: the photo shows dark-skinned people with weapons, and that is apparently enough to suit his needs.

Also relevant is this posting:




The blog post linked to here, written by an anonymous author, lists 34 non-white people "who have killed, raped and otherwise violated British men, women and children in Britain". Exactly what this is supposed to prove is unclear - surely no sensible person has argued that such crimes are only ever committed by white people? - but considering the links to various sites such as Stormfront that can be found at the bottom of the blog, I think it's clear what ideology the author subscribes to.

But watch out - if you are an English person and object to such postings being made by your self-proclaimed representatives, then you are a "big-baby", "Judas" "betrayor" [sic] and "frit", amongst other things:




It goes on. Here's the group linking with approval to an article on the openly neo-Nazi website Metapedia:




At the time of writing, this post is still there - three weeks since it was first made. It has six "likes", and none of the group's supporters have objected to the English Advocates promoting a Nazi website.

Ingram often boasts about his group consisting of "non-stereotypical" English nationalists, implying that he is staying away from the bigoted elements of the movement. Despite this the English Advocates are not above soliciting support from the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, as evidenced by this posting that the group made on the ASF's Facebook page:





On a similar note, the group has previously enlisted one Darren Clarke for its activities:



Darren is one of the people who engages in the charming practise (which I discussed in the first post in this series) of referring to ethnic minorities as "orcs":




There is at least one organisation that Ingram has condemned for its bigotry, however: the Bangladesh Nationalist Party.




While Ingram is right to condemn the Bangladesh Nationalist Party for its "hatred" and "intolerance" (the party has associated itself with Islamist groups such as the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami and the Islami Oikya Jote), it is interesting to note that he appears never to have used such terms to describe the Anglo-Saxon Foundation or similarly racist English outfits.

The reason seems clear enough: the ASF is run by English nationalists, while the Bangladeshi Nationalist Party is run by "orcs".

Meanwhile, the group has also offered some frankly rather facile comments on the Israel/Palestine conflict:



Incidentally, given that Gandhi was a racist, he probably isn't the best person to turn to if you want to justify your views on race relations.

Moving on, here is an example of the rather pitiful attempts at grassroots activism which the group endorses:





Yes, the group's supporters are going around putting up flyposters with catchy Old English slogans such as "Ende ecynnslæht of þá Englisc" and"Stepe scéadwínesse togeagnes þá Englisc". Do they seriously believe that anybody other than a few linguists will actually understand this stuff?

Notice, by the way, that the English Advocates have "liked" Julia Howman's description of Nelson Mandela as a "black African terrorist":





And finally, things go full circle:



Tony Linsell's An English Nationalism is something I discussed right at the start of this series: its influence permeates the entire Englisc nationalist movement.

These people claim to represent the interests of ordinary English people - but at the end of the day, all they represent are the interests of Tony Linsell.


Conclusion




Operation English Vote, predicting "thousands of white dragon flags" being flown from English homes in the next two years. Two years have passed since this post was made - so where are all these white dragon flags?


Here is a short summary of the Englisc nationalist movement's history, as I see it.

The literature of Athelney Press and the Steadfast journal, operating under the guiding hand of Tony Linsell, laid the groundwork for the movement. Linsell and his cohorts then set up the Steadfast Trust as a means of putting their ideals into action.

The Anglo-Saxon Foundation managed to build a small community along Englisc nationalist lines, based partly on Linsell's writing but showing a more explicitly racist ideology. Woden's Folk, meanwhile, found a place as the spiritual heart of the community.

Next, the Anglo-Saxon foundation made an attempt to spread its values through a grassroots movement, the English Shieldwall, with The English Community Group (Leicester)/English Advocates spinning out of this group.

However, this is where the movement hit a brick wall. And it is not hard to see why - how could Englisc nationalism ever become a mainstream movement?

To recap, this is a movement which claims to represent the majority of English people - and yet aligns itself with the tiny minority religion of Wodenism, treating England's majority religion of Christianity with contempt.

A movement that condemns immigrants, while celebrating Anglo-Saxon immigration in the early medieval period.

A movement that attacks "multiculturalism" as a deadly foe, while also trying to revive the culture of pre-Norman England by supporting a minority religion, a minority language and even a minority alphabet.

A movement which maintains a "reds under the beds" mentality, but which itself has links to neo-Nazi groups.

A movement which mocks the romantic nationalism of Wales, Scotland and Ireland, while creating an equally daft romantic nationalism for England.

A movement which condemns Islam for its extremist element, while seeking to promote Wodenism - a religion which also has a pretty hefty extremist element.

A movement which condemns anything that it can paint as anti-English racism while ignoring or endorsing racism towards all other groups.

A movement that claims to be based on common sense, but which endorses all manner of mystical mumbo-jumbo and ludicrous conspiracy theories.

In short, it is a movement riddled with contradictions, based on the fallacy of the "enlightened" and the "masses" (which I deconstructed here), destined never to get off the starting line.

So, why did I decide to write a three-part article covering the movement's development over a course of fourteen years? Well, the truth is that I find something oddly fascinating about it all. I honestly believe that, in Englisc nationalism, we can see a microcosm of fringe politics.

How many other movements out there, I wonder, have used the same tactics and made the same mistakes as Englisc nationalism?



Appendix: The also-rans



Englisc Resistance, a Facebook group run by someone who genuinely seems to believe that Wodenism is as large and influential a religion as Judaism.


Here is a quick list of some other groups relevant to Englisc nationalism, ones which I did not think were worth covering in full during this series of posts.

English Defence League: Needs no introduction. Not strictly part of the Englisc movement, as it is focused more on immigration and Islam than on race; however, there is a degree of overlap between the EDL and groups such as English Shieldwall. Generally held at arms' length by the Englisc movement.

English Democrats: If the EDL is held at arms' length, the English Democrats party is widely treated as an outright pariah by the Englisc movement for (to them) abandoning racial matters. Co-founded by Tony Linsell, who has since left the party.

English Movement: Officially, this is a sister group to Woden's Folk. However, the overlap is so large that the two organisations may as well be considered the same group operating under different names.

English National Resistance: A name used by two groups. The first was openly white nationalist and, as I demonstrated in the first post in this series, promoted by Tony Linsell through the Steadfast journal. The second is an EDL splinter group dedicated to anti-Islam campaigns.

Essex English Community Group: Clone of Lee Ingram's Leicester English Community Group with little or no presence outside of Facebook. Openly racist, speaking of "wogs", "orcs", "the yellow peril" and so forth. Possibly related to a website called Saxon Faction.

Forefather: A nationalist heavy metal group with connections to the Steadfast Trust.

Northants English Welfare Society: A Northamptonshire-based outfit with ties to the Steadfast Trust.

Operation English Vote: A nationalist take-off on Operation Black Vote.

Wulfshead: A nationalist band formed by the Anglo-Saxon Foundation posters AelfredSeax and Geþun Hreodpipere. This wiki article gives their real names as Adam Davis and Craig Davis, but does not cite a source for this information.

Tuesday, 1 July 2014

The history of the "Englisc" nationalist movement, part 2: The supporters gather

In the first post in this series, I looked at three groups (all founded or at least co-founded by Tony Linsell) that laid the groundwork for a movement which I term "Englisc nationalism". With this post, I will look at two subsequent organisations that helped to develop the movement...


UEP/Anglo-Saxon Foundation/Englisc-Gateway (established 2004)



This is a message board that started out as the forum of a website called United English Patriots (UEP for short; its website was at UEPEngland.com). It later adopted its current title of Anglo-Saxon Foundation, and is now part of a wider website called Englisc-Gateway. A Whois lookup of the original URL reveals that the site was started in September 2004, although the forum may have come along a little later.

I plan to devote a whole post to this forum and its leadership at a later date, but for now I will keep things simple: the Anglo-Saxon Foundation is where things get really racist.

RationalWiki and Fundies say the Darndest Things have already done thorough jobs of covering what the forum's members stand for, but here is a quick selection of some typical posts...











(The above post is a reply to a thread about a black rapist. Before any ASFers swoop down on me, yes, AelfredSeax is entirely right to condemn the rapist - but why is he using the incident to justify the murder of James Byrd Jr?)











Any ASF members reading this will probably claim that I have taken the above posts out of context. But really, what kind of context would make them any more acceptable? Are we expected to believe that the ASF is some kind of role-playing group whose members sit around pretending to be bigots for fun?

For once, it does not appear that Tony Linsell had a hand in starting this group - not directly, anyway. But his writing is an oft-cited inspiration amongst the members...








(The above poster, who boasts of meeting Tony Linsell on a yearly basis, is the Nazi sympathiser and Breivik supporter Clive Calladine - I discussed him at length here)

The ASF also shows strong support for the Steadfast Trust, and I do not think that it would be too much of an exaggeration to describe it as the unofficial Steadfast Trust forum. For one thing, there is a notable overlap in membership.

The OpenCharities page on the Steadfast Trust names five people as trustees: Julien Crighton, Shelly Donohoe, Mark Taylor, Tim Hawke and Lynn Chorley.

Mark Taylor, the Steadfast Trust's events co-ordinator, posts at the ASF under the name "Scyld Scefing":



Tim Hawke is also a poster at the forum (although, to be fair, not a very active one):




As for Lynn Chorley, well, just compare her user image on Facebook...



...with that of the ASF member "Saxonmaiden":



I'm not the only person to have noticed this:



Moving on to Julien Crighton, look at this article by Richard Chambers on the Anglo-Saxon Books website:

"Monday 6th October 2003. Seven days ago the England Society had officially launched as a Student Union society at Keele University in North Staffordshire. [...] Our one and only leaflet at the time was a simple affair consisting of a welcome and thanks for interest before going on to give the basics about fair and moderate representation, a list of planned and provisional events over the first few months and a short piece on the current political struggles faced by England and the English, kindly provided by Julien Crighton from wearetheenglish.com." [emphasis mine]

WeAreTheEnglish.com is an online store whose official message board is hosted by - you guessed it - the Anglo-Saxon Foundation.

I've already provided evidence of a Steadfast trustee spending his saturday with a Stormfront member. These people really need a talking to about their connections to racist Internet forums.

We should not be surprised to find that the Steadfast Trust has openly endorsed the ASF (along with the similarly racist Woden's Folk, discussed below) by calling for the forum's members to be invited to an official charity event:




And sure enough they came, something which the Steadfast Trust acknowledges on its website:

"Steadfast Trust, Woden’s Folk, Shieldwall, ED and ASF supporters gathered together at Battle in spite of dire weather warnings for the Sussex area. Having met up in our usual haunt ‘The Abbey Inn’, we had a pleasant hour to enjoy a fine ale or two and discuss matters affecting the whole English community, and to ‘put faces to names’ which was very rewarding.

[...]

Wreaths were laid, and this was followed by a blot made by Woden’s Folk at which the meadhorn was passed and oaths were taken to continue the fight to retain our native land. Once again, a big ‘thank you’ to everyone who attended.
Waes hael!"


Woden's Folk (online presence cemented 2005)



Woden's Folk is the name of a cult that was set up in 1998 by someone who calls himself Wulf Ingessunu. Its original, Freeserve-hosted website began in 2000 at the latest, and it moved to its own domain in 2005.

I have decided to place the group at this point in the chronology because it was around the time that the disparate groupings of the Englisc nationalist movement merged together. The way I see it, Tony Linsell provided the political theory, Wulf Ingessunu provided the spirituality and mysticism, and the two streams converged at the Anglo-Saxon Foundation forum.



Wulf Ingessunu, founder of Woden's Folk


I covered Woden's Folk in full here. As a quick summary, this is a bizarre religious sect that has attracted criticism (some of it from other pagans and heathens) for two main reasons:

1: Its overt racism, including outright neo-Nazi links;
2: The fact that it has taken a line of dialogue from the 1980s television series Robin of Sherwood and tried to pass it off as an "ancient prophecy".

In fact, looking over the evidence that I presented in my last post about this group, I'm going to come right out and say that Woden's Folk is a pro-Nazi organisation. There is simply no way that an organisation could forge links with so many neo-Nazi elements without sharing at least some of that philosophy itself.

Having already discussed the group itself at length, I will take the opportunity here to talk about the connections between Woden's Folk and other Englisc nationalist groups. For a start, Woden's Folk are well-liked at the Anglo-Saxon Foundation: as can be seen from the thread archived at RationalWiki here, here and here, the ASF members are willing to support the group even in the knowledge that Ingessunu's "ancient prophecy" was swiped from a TV show.

And I have already shown above that the supposedly non-racist Steadfast Trust has endorsed this group - although quite how a charity dedicated to preserving and promoting the history of England can give a thumbs-up to people who are trying to reconstruct England's pre-Christian religion from a TV series is beyond me.

On the other hand, I did note the curiously Conan the Barbarian-esque history lesson given by Steadfast Trust co-founder Tony Linsell in the last post in this series. I have also noted how people in the Englisc nationalist movement have latched on to a "warrior's prayer" from the film The 13th Warrior. These people appear to get a remarkable amount of their history and religion from twentieth-century fiction.

One significant link between Woden's Folk and other Englisc nationalist groups is a man who calls himself "Bretwalda Randwulf", "Randwulf Iren Heorte", "Youngy" or "Yngvi" depending on which part of the Internet he is currently inhabiting. RationalWiki has an article about this strange fellow which goes into plenty of detail (more detail than anybody could reasonably hope for, in fact) about Youngy's beliefs, activities and regrettable attempts at poetry.

As a quick sample, here are Youngy's thoughts on race relations:






In 2011 Youngy/Bretwalda Randwulf organised a nationalist festival called the English Folcmoot:






Youngy's event was was funded by... the Steadfast Trust (Goodness me, I'm starting to feel like Glenn Beck joining the dots on his blackboard):

"Early in the establishment of the Steadfast Trust it was hoped that the charity would be able to organise a yearly family fair celebrating the culture of the early Anglo-Saxon Englisc in a fun, entertaining and educational way.

So when the charity was approached with the request to fund the Great Englisc Folcmoot 2011, we naturally did all we could to help, which included providing £4000 in funding for equipment (all of which will be used next year), hired entertainment and health and safety expenses.

[...]

There was also a surprise visit from members of the Leicester English Community Group who thanked the charity for a recent book grant."

At this point, the Englisc nationalists were hoping to reach out to the masses and lead a revolution. Unfortunately for them, this was not to happen. In the third and possibly final post in this series, I will look at their failed attempts to establish grassroots Englisc nationalist movements.