Edmund Dee's White Wyrm Rising: White Wyrm or whitewash?

One of my first posts on this blog was about the nationalist publications put out by Athelney, an imprint of Anglo-Saxon Books.

Proof of the relationship between Anglo-Saxon Books and Athelney, from the Directory of Publishing 2014.

At the time I mentioned that Athelney had been keeping a low profile for a few years, but was preparing to publish a new book entitled White Wyrm Rising: A Journey into Modern English Nationalism.

The book in question was finally published this January. I was interested in covering it, but out of reluctance to give my money to Athelney, I waited until a second-hand copy of White Wyrm Rising turned up on Abebooks before buying it.

My copy arrived recently, and as it is a very slim volume, it didn't take long to finish. I can't say I was impressed.

Written by someone called Edmund Dee, the book touches upon a number of the groups I've covered on this blog. In each case, Edmund makes a concerted attempt to sweep the racism perpetrated by those outfits under the carpet. White Wyrm Rising is a thoroughly disingenuous attempt to whitewash Englisc nationalism.

Throughout the book, Edmund paints nationalist groups such as the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, the English Shieldwall, Woden's Folk and the Steadfast Trust (the book came out shortly before the Exposure documentary on that last group) as noble, right-minded organisations which hold no hatred for people of other ethnicities, only love for the culture and heritage of England. Any racism in the English nationalist movement, according to Edmund, can be blamed squarely on a small, misguided minority - which the author portrays as being essentially a different movement entirely.

In reality, the Anglo-Saxon Foundation is a forum where stuff like this is posted on a regular basis:

...But you'd never know this from reading Edmund's shamelessly sanitised version of events. How can Anglo-Saxon Books, which purports to be a respectable publisher of informative books on history, justify shilling for a racist forum this way?

Anyway, on to the book itself. I recognised quite a few of the people mentioned by Edmund, even though he tends to identify them by their screen names:

"Ingy and Ynngy" are Lee Ingram and Paul Young.

Since the book was published by Athelney, we shouldn't be too surprised to find it plugging another Athelney publication:

Linsell's "holy book", incidentally, makes the bizarre claim that the English are descended from Aesir and Vanir. Edmund doesn't seem to find this at all dubious.

Our first real glimpse of just how disingenuous this book is comes when Edmund talks about the English Folcmoot, an event organised by Paul Young in 2011:

I've written about Wulf Ingessunu before; his organisation Woden's Folk is a neo-Nazi cult which believes Hitler to have been an avatar of Woden.

As for the loving couple Harold and Shirley, "Harold" is actually Clive Calladine, known on the Internet under the pseudonyms Harold Godwinsson and Teutoburg Weald. This is evidenced by a posting from the English Shieldwall website which names the couple as Clive and Shirley...

...And by one of "Harold"'s postings at the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, where he describes the ceremony himself:

I've documented his views at length here. In summary, Calladine regards Anders Breivik as a "hero"; feels that England should have been on the side of the Nazis during World War II; supports apartheid; believes that "the Jew" is conspiring against the white race; argues that liberals and Asians are "enemies" who can be justifiably murdered; endorses the criminalisation of homosexuality and race-mixing; and says that members of minority groups should not have human rights (even though, as a Wodenist, he is himself a member of a minority group)

Edmund is certainly aware of Calladine's extremist views, as they both post at the same forum. And yet, the author portrays Calladine as a loveable sort whose only visible flaw is his tendency to get into amusing arguments with his wife.

Early in the same chapter, Edmund pours scorn on some Morris dancers who were concerned that the English Folcmoot would attract a racist element. But the presence of Wulf Ingessunu and Clive Calladine demonstrates that those Morris dancers were entirely correct.

Again, Edmund namechecks his bigoted comrades. Seaxan is the owner of the Anglo-Saxon Foundation; I discussed his views here. AelfredSeax appears to be a fascist sympathiser, judging by the fact that he has an Oswald Mosley quotation in his signature at the ASF:

Moving on...

Let's take a second to unpack this. First of all, Edmund is quite right to treat antifascist protests with a degree of skepticism. Groups such as Unite Against Fascism and the Socialist Workers Party have atrocious records when it comes to free speech, and campaign against certain kinds of extremists while aligning themselves with others - particularly of the Islamic variety. Jesus and Mo sum them up:

However, Edmund is giving a seriously skewed version of events when he claims that the March for England demonstration was opposed by antifascists simply because it celebrated St. George's Day. If that were the case, then other St. George's Day celebrations - such as that held regularly at Stone Cross - would also be targeted by antifascists.

The reason the event was attacked by antifascists was because of the nature of the group which organised it - namely, the accusation that it has far-right connections (its Facebook page has linked approvingly to Casuals United). You may question the legitimacy of these accusations, but the fact remains that they are the reason for the group coming under scrutiny, not its decision to celebrate St. George's Day.

Edmund smugly dismisses the anti-fascists as "thousands of Anglophobes" who felt hatred "for anyone who reminded them that there was a country called England, and for anyone who dared celebrate its existence." This is a flat-out caricature: again, where were these "thousands of Anglophobes" at every other St. George's Day event around the country? The Brighton march was targeted because of the group behind it, not because of the day it was held on.

In the same chapter, Edmund names some of the Anglo-Saxon Foundation members who accompanied him to the 2012 March for England event. First is Osgar:

I have to wonder if this is the same Osgar who fell out with his daughter when she started dating a black man (or "a spade", as Osgar delicately refers to his potential son-in-law):

After this come a few others:

Well, "Steven" is possibly the same Steven who seems to think that the 2013 Westgate shopping mall attack was a Jewish conspiracy. But the really remarkable person in this group is Steed.

Steed is another member of the neo-Nazi Woden's Folk. He used to run a blog called Eye of Woden, where he made a number of utterly remarkable claims - that Zionists worship a race of intelligent lifeforms from Mars, and that the creators of the cartoon series Family Guy were in on the Boston Marathon bombing, to pick just two. He has since closed this blog but he can still be spotted in the comments section of Aryan Myth and Metahistory, run by his fellow neo-Nazi Wotans Krieger.

So, Edmund is pulling the exact same stunt as with his account of the English Folcmoot: scoffing at anyone who suggested that there were racists at the event, and then providing evidence that - yes - there were racists at the event.

By now, you should have a clear idea of what Edmund Dee was up to when he wrote this book: he was trying to pass off a bunch of racist cranks as simply honest folk who want what's best for their country.

But just who is this Edmund Dee person? Given his fascination with King Edmund, it seems likely that his name is a pseudonym.

In my next post, I will dig a little deeper and try to find out exactly who it was who wrote White Wyrm Rising...

The Essex English Community Group - another bunch of bigots

 The Essex English Community Group holds a meeting

I've been meaning to make a post about the Essex English Community Group for a while now. This was one of the organisations set up in response to the Steadfast Trust's call for a network of groups that will save us English people from the crushing bigotry we all face as a result of being, er, the ethnic majority of England. Poor us.

But now that I've sat down to write the post, I find that the group appears to have vanished. Its main page has vanished from Facebook, and its alt account has been renamed "Saxon Blood" with no mention of it ever having represented an organisation.

Fortunately, I bagged a few screengrabs of the group's bigoted ramblings while it was around. After swiping a few more from RationalWiki - currently the only website to go into any detail about the EECG - I think I've got enough to be going on with...

To the Essex English Community Group, black people are "wogs":

East Asians are "the yellow peril":

Non-white people in general are "orcs":

Mixed-race children have amusing names (notice that this was liked by someone calling himself "Ragnar Wodensson", who is presumably oblivious to the irony)

Homosexuals are "men who stick their todgers up each others arses" and so cannot complain about homophobia:

Shortly after the group was set up, it was attacked by someone called Maya:

The incident allowed the EECG to indulge in a spot of male chauvinism:

Note that Paul Pitt and Mark Pringle, who took part in the above debate, have each achieved a degree of infamy elsewhere. These people are not the only eyebrow-raising members of the Essex English Community Group, however...

  Jim Morgan: the biggest bigot in the EECG?

From this screengrab, we can see that one of the group's active members was a chap named Jim Morgan:

Jim Morgan later changed his name on Facebook to "Albion Angelcynn", as demonstrated by this later screencap of the discussion in the upper-right of the above image:

At the time of writing, he is using both names at the same time:

This screengrab of his Facebook photo album should give you a general idea of Morgan's political leanings:

 

Any doubt that Morgan is a Nazi sympathiser should be put to rest by this image:

 It goes on:

Morgan seems remarkably fond of the above image, as he has posted it at least three times:

Morgan and the Essex ECG share a fondness for firearms:

He is apparently preparing for a race war:

It comes as little surprise to find that Jim Morgan is a supporter of Anders Breivik, and considers those who would condemn Breivik's massacre to be mere "UAF paedos" (does UAF even exist in Norway?):

 

Morgan's fondness for violence against the defenceless is more than mere talk, as he has admitted to driving his car at a pregnant Roma woman in London:

So, where is all this leading? Well, just like the similarly racist Northants English Welfare Society, the Essex English Community Group was given the thumbs-up by the Steadfast Trust, which listed it as one of the organisations "which can benefit from help in the form of financial grants and advice / assistance from the Steadfast Trust":

Note that the above post was made in October 2014. The EECG had been active on Facebook since December 2012, so the Steadfast Trust must surely have known that it was a racist organisation which was willing to act as a happy home to neo-Nazi terrorist wannabes such as Jim Morgan.

Thus, we are faced with two options:

1) The Steadfast Trust simply does not care how racist its satellite organisations are, so long as they share its ethnic English nationalist agenda; or
2) The Steadfast Trust, registered charity no. 105806, is making an active effort to promote white supremacist groups.

Which is it, Steadfast?

The history of the "Englisc" nationalist movement, part 3: The grassroots fail to grow

This is the third and (for the time being) final post on the history of what I have termed the Englisc nationalist movement.

In the first post, I looked at the foundations of the movement, laid in large part by a writer named Tony Linsell. In the second post I charted how an online forum, the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, had provided a gathering point for the members of the movement. In this post, I will look at the movement's unseuccessful attempts to reach out to the public with grassroots organisations.

English Shieldwall (established 2010)

The English Shieldwall is a campaign group that was founded by "Youngy" (discussed in the previous post) along with Lee Ingram, a man whom I wrote about here. If Englisc nationalism had a Mt. Rushmore, then Ingram would be the fourth face - the other three being Tony Linsell, Wulf Ingessunu and Anglo-Saxon Foundation webmaster Seaxan.

Lee "Ingy" Ingram, possibly Tony Linsell's most active protege.

 Excerpt from Lee Ingram's blog, archived here.

For a complete history of the English Shieldwall and its activities, see RationalWiki. Suffice to say that it intended to be a campaign group similar to the EDL but focused on Englisc nationalism rather than anti-Islamist protests (although it dabbled in the latter as well).

Both of its founders were, at the time of the organisation's creation, members of the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, although Ingram is no longer a member of either group. The ASF also hosts the official Shieldwall forum. So big is the overlap that the ASF and Shieldwall may as well be considered two arms of the same group - one active on the Internet, the other active on the streets.

Formerly active, at least. The English Shieldwall appears to have wrapped up its activities in 2011, although it was never officially dissolved. In short, it was an attempt to create a grassroots organisation that simply never got off the ground.

The English Shieldwall website claims that "We have been fortunate to have benefited from a generous grant from the Steadfast Trust". In turn, the English Shieldwall has donated money to the Anglo-Saxon Foundation:

"I'd like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the ES for their recent donation which is outlined below. This has already been put to good use towards the running costs of the site for the next year. So once again, you have my thanks.

'Please accept this donation of two hundred pounds from the English Shieldwall.

We appreciate the constant, often unrewarding work you do through the Englisc Gateway and the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, and felt it was time that your work and effort was recognised. As we don't produce awards or medals, we have done the next best thing - a donation towards a website that we wouldn't exist without.

We will also take this opportunity to update you on our aims and objectives for 2012.

Our current aim sees us working towards encouraging folk to set up English Community Groups, such as the piloting group in Leicester, as well as promoting and celebrating English festival days. We will be promoting and where possible, supporting groups and organisations that we feel represent the best of English tradition, culture and heritage, as well as presenting opportunities for folk of English ethnicity - especially with regard to the traditional family setup.

As ever, we stay away from political matters, English religious debate and the monarchy, leaving these issues to the individual. Our focus is bringing the folk together in traditional ways.

We hope that you agree with our aims as we do yours, and look forward to the rest of 2012 and its many events and gatherings.

Regards,
English Shieldwall'"

From this, it would appear that the Steadfast Trust's money has indirectly been spent on funding a racist Internet forum. The Charity Commission really should look into this.

Incidentally, since writing the previous post in this series, I have found out the English Shieldwall co-founder Youngy/Bretwalda Randwulf is actually named Paul Young, thanks to this quotation from Lee Ingram (written after the two men fell out with each other):

A typical posting by Paul "Youngy" Young. This is a man whom the purportedly non-racist Steadfast Trust thinks is deserving of funds.

English Community Group (Leicester)/English Advocates (established 2011)

Somewhere along the line Lee Ingram got into a dispute with his fellow Anglo-Saxon Foundation and English Shieldwall members, resulting in him being banned from the former and leaving the latter. In the tried and true tradition of fringe politics, this bout of infighting resulted in the creation of a knock-off organisation.

As noted previously, the Steadfast Trust hoped to inspire its supporters to create "English community groups" around the country. A few of them tried, but most got little further than starting up Facebook pages (see RationalWiki for an overview); the only one that had anything remotely resembling success was the Leicester group, which at least made it into the local paper a couple of times.

Clive Potter, the "ordinary Englishman" who thinks that grey aliens are warning us about the effects of interracial marriage.

The ECG(L) was originally chaired by a very strange man named Clive Potter, an ex-BNP member and ufologist who is no longer affiliated with the group. Other key members include Paul Brant and Gary Thompson. However, from the get-go, the true driving force of the organisation seems to have been Lee Ingram.

Our pal Lee Ingram again.

The ECG(L)'s roots as an English Shieldwall splinter group are pretty clear. Just compare this page on the English Shieldwall website…

...with this page on the ECG(L) website:

Clearly, one is lifting from the other.

The ECG(L) has received funding from the Steadfast Trust. It stands to reason that the charity would back activities in this city, given that the Steadfast Trust's events co-ordinator Mark Taylor has declared Leicester to be "the country's worst town", apparently because "they are soon going to outnumber the ethnic English".

"This far and no further OR ELSE", he threatens:

The ECG(L) apparently could not sustain itself as a local group, however, and in March this year it rebranded itself as a nationwide group called English Advocates.

In my earlier post about Lee Ingram I concluded that he was a rather simple-minded fellow who had allowed himself to become a useful idiot for racism, but was not necessarily a racist himself. I'm reconsidering that position after seeing that he posted (or allowed to be posted) this image on the official English Advocates Facebook page:

The photograph, from 2006, shows a gang of machete-wielding guerillas from East Timor acting as part of a rebel campaign against the country's government (exactly what a lot of people in Englisc nationalism want to carry out here in England, in fact). It seems doubtful that Ingram knows or cares about the exact political situation behind the image: the photo shows dark-skinned people with weapons, and that is apparently enough to suit his needs.

Also relevant is this posting:

The blog post linked to here, written by an anonymous author, lists 34 non-white people "who have killed, raped and otherwise violated British men, women and children in Britain". Exactly what this is supposed to prove is unclear - surely no sensible person has argued that such crimes are only ever committed by white people? - but considering the links to various sites such as Stormfront that can be found at the bottom of the blog, I think it's clear what ideology the author subscribes to.

But watch out - if you are an English person and object to such postings being made by your self-proclaimed representatives, then you are a "big-baby", "Judas" "betrayor" [sic] and "frit", amongst other things:

It goes on. Here's the group linking with approval to an article on the openly neo-Nazi website Metapedia:

At the time of writing, this post is still there - three weeks since it was first made. It has six "likes", and none of the group's supporters have objected to the English Advocates promoting a Nazi website.

Ingram often boasts about his group consisting of "non-stereotypical" English nationalists, implying that he is staying away from the bigoted elements of the movement. Despite this the English Advocates are not above soliciting support from the Anglo-Saxon Foundation, as evidenced by this posting that the group made on the ASF's Facebook page:

On a similar note, the group has previously enlisted one Darren Clarke for its activities:

Darren is one of the people who engages in the charming practise (which I discussed in the first post in this series) of referring to ethnic minorities as "orcs":

There is at least one organisation that Ingram has condemned for its bigotry, however: the Bangladesh Nationalist Party.

While Ingram is right to condemn the Bangladesh Nationalist Party for its "hatred" and "intolerance" (the party has associated itself with Islamist groups such as the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami and the Islami Oikya Jote), it is interesting to note that he appears never to have used such terms to describe the Anglo-Saxon Foundation or similarly racist English outfits.

The reason seems clear enough: the ASF is run by English nationalists, while the Bangladeshi Nationalist Party is run by "orcs".

Meanwhile, the group has also offered some frankly rather facile comments on the Israel/Palestine conflict:

Incidentally, given that Gandhi was a racist, he probably isn't the best person to turn to if you want to justify your views on race relations.

Moving on, here is an example of the rather pitiful attempts at grassroots activism which the group endorses:

Yes, the group's supporters are going around putting up flyposters with catchy Old English slogans such as "Ende ecynnslæht of þá Englisc" and"Stepe scéadwínesse togeagnes þá Englisc". Do they seriously believe that anybody other than a few linguists will actually understand this stuff?

Notice, by the way, that the English Advocates have "liked" Julia Howman's description of Nelson Mandela as a "black African terrorist":

And finally, things go full circle:

Tony Linsell's An English Nationalism is something I discussed right at the start of this series: its influence permeates the entire Englisc nationalist movement.

These people claim to represent the interests of ordinary English people - but at the end of the day, all they represent are the interests of Tony Linsell.

Conclusion

Operation English Vote, predicting "thousands of white dragon flags" being flown from English homes in the next two years. Two years have passed since this post was made - so where are all these white dragon flags?

Here is a short summary of the Englisc nationalist movement's history, as I see it.

The literature of Athelney Press and the Steadfast journal, operating under the guiding hand of Tony Linsell, laid the groundwork for the movement. Linsell and his cohorts then set up the Steadfast Trust as a means of putting their ideals into action.

The Anglo-Saxon Foundation managed to build a small community along Englisc nationalist lines, based partly on Linsell's writing but showing a more explicitly racist ideology. Woden's Folk, meanwhile, found a place as the spiritual heart of the community.

Next, the Anglo-Saxon foundation made an attempt to spread its values through a grassroots movement, the English Shieldwall, with The English Community Group (Leicester)/English Advocates spinning out of this group.

However, this is where the movement hit a brick wall. And it is not hard to see why - how could Englisc nationalism ever become a mainstream movement?

To recap, this is a movement which claims to represent the majority of English people - and yet aligns itself with the tiny minority religion of Wodenism, treating England's majority religion of Christianity with contempt.

A movement that condemns immigrants, while celebrating Anglo-Saxon immigration in the early medieval period.

A movement that attacks "multiculturalism" as a deadly foe, while also trying to revive the culture of pre-Norman England by supporting a minority religion, a minority language and even a minority alphabet.

A movement which maintains a "reds under the beds" mentality, but which itself has links to neo-Nazi groups.

A movement which mocks the romantic nationalism of Wales, Scotland and Ireland, while creating an equally daft romantic nationalism for England.

A movement which condemns Islam for its extremist element, while seeking to promote Wodenism - a religion which also has a pretty hefty extremist element.

A movement which condemns anything that it can paint as anti-English racism while ignoring or endorsing racism towards all other groups.

A movement that claims to be based on common sense, but which endorses all manner of mystical mumbo-jumbo and ludicrous conspiracy theories.

In short, it is a movement riddled with contradictions, based on the fallacy of the "enlightened" and the "masses" (which I deconstructed here), destined never to get off the starting line.

So, why did I decide to write a three-part article covering the movement's development over a course of fourteen years? Well, the truth is that I find something oddly fascinating about it all. I honestly believe that, in Englisc nationalism, we can see a microcosm of fringe politics.

How many other movements out there, I wonder, have used the same tactics and made the same mistakes as Englisc nationalism?

Appendix: The also-rans

Englisc Resistance, a Facebook group run by someone who genuinely seems to believe that Wodenism is as large and influential a religion as Judaism.

Here is a quick list of some other groups relevant to Englisc nationalism, ones which I did not think were worth covering in full during this series of posts.

English Defence League: Needs no introduction. Not strictly part of the Englisc movement, as it is focused more on immigration and Islam than on race; however, there is a degree of overlap between the EDL and groups such as English Shieldwall. Generally held at arms' length by the Englisc movement.

English Democrats: If the EDL is held at arms' length, the English Democrats party is widely treated as an outright pariah by the Englisc movement for (to them) abandoning racial matters. Co-founded by Tony Linsell, who has since left the party.

English Movement: Officially, this is a sister group to Woden's Folk. However, the overlap is so large that the two organisations may as well be considered the same group operating under different names.

English National Resistance: A name used by two groups. The first was openly white nationalist and, as I demonstrated in the first post in this series, promoted by Tony Linsell through the Steadfast journal. The second is an EDL splinter group dedicated to anti-Islam campaigns.

Essex English Community Group: Clone of Lee Ingram's Leicester English Community Group with little or no presence outside of Facebook. Openly racist, speaking of "wogs", "orcs", "the yellow peril" and so forth. Possibly related to a website called Saxon Faction.

Forefather: A nationalist heavy metal group with connections to the Steadfast Trust.

Northants English Welfare Society: A Northamptonshire-based outfit with ties to the Steadfast Trust.

Operation English Vote: A nationalist take-off on Operation Black Vote.

Wulfshead: A nationalist band formed by the Anglo-Saxon Foundation posters AelfredSeax and Geþun Hreodpipere. This wiki article gives their real names as Adam Davis and Craig Davis, but does not cite a source for this information.